31. According to Paragraph 1, art-science collaborations have
- A. caught the attention of critics.
- B. received favorable responses.
- C. promoted academic publishing.
- D. sparked heated public disputes.
答案：B
答案句：Enlightening, challenging, stimulating, fun. These were some of the words that Nature readers used to describe their experience of art-science collaborations in a series of articles on partnerships between artists and researchers. Nearly 40% of the roughly 350 people who responded to an accompanying poll said they had collaborated with artists; and almost all said they would consider doing so in future.
参考译文：启发性的、具有挑战性的、刺激的、有趣的。这些是《自然》杂志的读者在关于艺术家和研究人员合作的一系列文章中描述他们艺术-科学合作经历时使用的一些词语。在约350名参与附带调查的人中，近40%的人表示他们曾与艺术家合作过；几乎所有人都表示他们将来会考虑这样做。
定位线索：题干“According to Paragraph 1”→答案句取自第1段“These were some of the words that Nature readers used to describe their experience”；文中“Enlightening, challenging, stimulating, fun”和“almost all said they would consider doing so in future”对应选项B“received favorable responses”（获得积极回应）。
解析：题干问艺术-科学合作获得了什么，答案句直接给出读者用“启发性的、具有挑战性的、刺激的、有趣的”等正面词汇描述体验，且近40%的人曾合作、几乎所有人都愿意未来合作，这些均表明合作获得了积极回应，对应B选项。A项“引起评论家关注”无中生有；C项“促进学术出版”和D项“引发激烈公众争论”均未提及，属于无中生有。
32. The reworked version of The Four Seasons is mentioned to show that
- A. art can offer audiences easy access to science.
- B. science can help with the expression of emotions.
- C. public participation in science has a promising future.
- D. art is effective in facilitating scientific innovations.
答案：A
答案句：One example of how artists and scientists have together rocked the scenes came last month when the Sydney Symphony Orchestra performed a reworked version of Antonio Vivaldi's The Four Seasons. They reimagined the 300-year-old score by injecting the latest climate prediction data for each season—provided by Monash University's Climate Change Communication Research Hub. The performance was a creative call to action ahead of November's United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, UK.
参考译文：艺术家和科学家如何共同震撼现场的一个例子发生在上个月，当时悉尼交响乐团演奏了安东尼奥·维瓦尔第的《四季》的改编版本。他们通过注入莫纳什大学气候变化传播研究中心提供的每个季节的最新气候预测数据，重新构想了这部有300年历史的乐谱。这场演出是在英国格拉斯哥举行的联合国气候变化大会之前的一次创造性行动呼吁。
定位线索：题干“The reworked version of The Four Seasons is mentioned to show”→答案句取自第2段“One example of how artists and scientists have together rocked the scenes”；文中“injecting the latest climate prediction data”和“a creative call to action”对应选项A“art can offer audiences easy access to science”（艺术能让观众容易接触科学）。
解析：题干问提到《四季》改编版是为了说明什么，答案句明确指出这是“艺术家和科学家如何共同震撼现场的一个例子”，通过注入气候预测数据让观众在艺术中接触科学信息，因此例子前面的观点句“Artists help scientists reach a broader audience and make emotional connections that enhance learning”才是关键，正确选项A是对该观点的同义转述。B项“科学帮助表达情感”偷换概念，原文是艺术帮助科学传播；C项“公众参与科学前景光明”和D项“艺术有效促进科学创新”均未在例子中体现，属于无中生有。
33. Some artists seem to worry about in the art-science partnership
- A. their role may be underestimated.
- B. their reputation may be impaired.
- C. their creativity may be inhibited.
- D. their work may be misguided.
答案：A
答案句：But a genuine partnership must be a two-way street. Fewer artists than scientists responded to the Nature poll, however, several respondents noted that artists do not simply assist scientists with their communication requirements. Nor should their work be considered only as an object of study.
参考译文：但真正的伙伴关系必须是双向的。回应《自然》调查的艺术家比科学家少，然而，几位受访者指出，艺术家不仅仅是协助科学家满足他们的传播需求。他们的工作也不应仅仅被视为研究的对象。
定位线索：题干“Some artists seem to worry about in the art-science partnership”→答案句取自第3段“artists do not simply assist scientists with their communication requirements”和“Nor should their work be considered only as an object of study”；文中“do not simply assist”和“should not be considered only as an object of study”对应选项A“their role may be underestimated”（他们的角色可能被低估）。
解析：题干问艺术家在合作中可能担心什么，答案句指出艺术家“不仅仅是协助科学家满足传播需求”，且“工作不应仅被视为研究对象”，暗示艺术家担心自己的角色被简化为辅助者或研究对象，即被低估，对应A选项。B项“声誉受损”、C项“创造力受抑制”和D项“工作被误导”均未在原文提及，属于无中生有。
34. What does the author say about CAVS?
- A. It was headed alternately by artists and scientists.
- B. It exemplified valuable art-science alliances.
- C. Its projects aimed at advancing visual studies.
- D. Its founders sought to raise the status of artists.
答案：B
答案句：The founders deliberately focused their projects around light — hence the “visual studies” in the name. Light was a something that both artists and scientists had an interest in, and therefore could form the basis of collaboration. As science and technology progressed, and divided into more sub-disciplines, the centre was simultaneously looking to a time when leading researchers could also be artists, writers and poets, and vice versa.
参考译文：创始人特意将项目集中在光上——因此名称中有“视觉研究”。光是艺术家和科学家都感兴趣的东西，因此可以构成合作的基础。随着科学和技术的发展，并分裂为更多的子学科，该中心同时展望了一个时代，即顶尖研究人员也可以成为艺术家、作家和诗人，反之亦然。
定位线索：题干“What does the author say about CAVS?”→答案句取自第4段“The founders deliberately focused their projects around light”和“Light was a something that both artists and scientists had an interest in”；文中“both artists and scientists had an interest in”和“could form the basis of collaboration”对应选项B“It exemplified valuable art-science alliances”（它体现了有价值的艺术-科学联盟）。
解析：题干问作者对CAVS的看法，答案句说明CAVS的创始人选择光和艺术与科学共同感兴趣的主题作为合作基础，并展望研究者与艺术家融合的未来，这体现了有价值的艺术-科学联盟，对应B选项。A项“由艺术家和科学家轮流领导”无中生有；C项“项目旨在推进视觉研究”偷换概念，原文说光只是合作基础；D项“创始人寻求提高艺术家地位”未提及，属于无中生有。
35. In the last paragraph, the author holds that art-science collaborations
- A. are likely to go beyond public expectations.
- B. will intensify interdisciplinary competition.
- C. should do more than communicating science.
- D. are becoming more popular than before.
答案：C
答案句：The reach of art-science tie-ups needs to go beyond the necessary purpose of research communication, and participants must not fall into the trap of stereotyping each other.
参考译文：艺术-科学合作的范围需要超越研究传播的必要目的，参与者绝不能陷入对彼此刻板印象的陷阱。
定位线索：题干“In the last paragraph, the author holds that art-science collaborations”→答案句取自最后一段“The reach of art-science tie-ups needs to go beyond the necessary purpose of research communication”；文中“needs to go beyond the necessary purpose of research communication”对应选项C“should do more than communicating science”（应该做的不仅仅是传播科学）。
解析：题干问作者在最后一段对艺术-科学合作的看法，答案句明确指出合作“需要超越研究传播的必要目的”，即应做得更多，对应C选项。A项“可能超出公众预期”无中生有；B项“将加剧跨学科竞争”未提及；D项“比以前更受欢迎”在原文未直接体现，属于答非所问。