46. Why have three artists brought a lawsuit against Stability AI, DeviantArt, and Midjourney?
- A. They claim that the use of the Stable Diffusion tool is a violation of law.
- B. They claim these companies infringed their intellectual property rights.
- C. They want to stop the use of all AI tools in the creation of art works.
- D. They want to prevent artists from being compelled to rely on AI tools.
答案：B
答案句：Three artists have brought a lawsuit against Stability AI, DeviantArt, and Midjourney, alleging that the text-to-image AI tools have infringed the rights of thousands of artists. … The lawsuit claims that the Stable Diffusion tool used by Stability AI, DeviantArt, and Midjourney was trained on billions of copyrighted images downloaded from the internet and used by the companies “without compensation or consent from the artists.”
参考译文：三位艺术家对Stability AI、DeviantArt和Midjourney提起诉讼，指控这些文本到图像的人工智能工具侵犯了数千名艺术家的权利。 … 诉讼称，Stability AI、DeviantArt和Midjourney使用的Stable Diffusion工具是在从互联网下载的数十亿受版权保护的图像上训练的，并且这些公司使用这些图像“未经艺术家的补偿或同意”。
定位线索：题干“Why have three artists brought a lawsuit”→答案句首句“alleging that the text-to-image AI tools have infringed the rights”；文中“infringed the rights”对应选项B“infringed their intellectual property rights”。
解析：题干问三位艺术家起诉的原因，答案句首句直接说明他们指控AI工具“infringed the rights of thousands of artists”，即侵犯了艺术家权利，与选项B“infringed their intellectual property rights”（侵犯知识产权）同义。选项A“违反法律”过于笼统，未具体指向侵权；选项C“停止所有AI工具”和选项D“防止艺术家被迫依赖AI”均无原文依据，属于无中生有。
48. What makes artists furious aside from copyright infringement?
- A. Art works produced with AI tools are not banned from art-sharing platforms.
- B. Text-to-image generators have won such great popularity in the past year.
- C. Their distorted signatures appear more and more frequently in AI art.
- D. AI tools can bypass the considerable labor involved in creating art works.
答案：D
答案句：Not only are many artists furious at the possible copyright violations of AI art, but they have also been frustrated by how AI tools are able to sidestep the labor and art processes they are required to go through.
参考译文：许多艺术家不仅对AI艺术可能侵犯版权感到愤怒，而且对AI工具能够绕过他们必须经历的劳动和艺术创作过程感到沮丧。
定位线索：题干“aside from copyright infringement”→答案句“Not only... but they have also been frustrated”；文中“sidestep the labor and art processes”对应选项D“bypass the considerable labor”。
解析：题干问除版权侵权外艺术家愤怒的原因，答案句用“Not only... but also”结构，后半部分指出“frustrated by how AI tools are able to sidestep the labor and art processes”，即AI工具绕过劳动和艺术过程，对应选项D“bypass the considerable labor”。选项A“AI作品未被禁止”与原文“many artists have been trying to ban AI art”不符，属于偷换概念；选项B“AI工具受欢迎”和选项C“扭曲签名出现”是背景信息，不是愤怒原因，答非所问。